Measures for a Multidimensional Multiverse

Abstract

We explore the phenomenological implications of generalizing measures to a multidimensional multiverse. We consider a simple model in which the vacua are nucleated from a D-dimensional parent spacetime through dynamical compactification of the extra dimensions, and compute the geometric contribution to the probability distribution of observations within the multiverse for each measure. We then study how the shape of this probability distribution depends on the timescales for the existence of observers, for vacuum domination, and for curvature domination (tobs, t, and tc, respectively.) In this work we restrict ourselves to bubbles with positive cosmological constant, . In the case of the causal patch cutoff, when the bubble universes have p+1 large spatial dimensions with p ≥ 2, the shape of the probability distribution is such that we obtain the coincidence of timescales tobs t tc. Moreover, the size of the cosmological constant is related to the size of the landscape. However, the exact shape of the probability distribution is different in the case p = 2, compared to p ≥ 3. In the case of the fat geodesic measure, the result is even more robust: the shape of the probability distribution is the same for all p ≥ 2, and we once again obtain the coincidence tobs t tc. These results require only very mild conditions on the prior probability of the distribution of vacua in the landscape. Our work shows that the observed double coincidence of timescales is a robust prediction even when the multiverse is generalized to be multidimensional; that this coincidence is not a consequence of our particular universe being (3+1)-dimensional; and that this observable cannot be used to preferentially select one measure over another in a multidimensional multiverse.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…