Agent Arrangement Problem
Abstract
An arrangement of an ordered pair (GA, GM) of graphs is defined as a function f from V(GA) to V(GM) such that, for each vertex c of GM, the vertex-set f-1(c) of GA either is (the case when c ∈ f(V(GA))) or induces a connected subgraph of GA and that the family \f-1(y) : y ∈ V(GM), f-1(y) ≠ \ is a partition of V(GA). Let f be an arrangement of (GA, GM), let pq be an edge of GM and let U be a subset of f-1(p) such that each of the three graphs GA[U], GA[f-1(p) U] and GA[f-1(q) U] is ether connected or and that (f-1(p) f-1(q) ) U ≠ . A transfer of U from p to q is defined as the modification f of f such that f(x):=f(x) for every x U and f(u):=q for every u ∈ U. Two arrangements f and g of (GA, GM) are called t-equivalent if they can be transformed into each other by a finite sequence of transfers. An ordered pair (GA, GM) of graphs is called almighty if every two arrangements of the pair (GA, GM) are t-equivalent. In this study, we consider the following two decision problems. [ (P1)]For a given pair of arrangements f and g of a given ordered pair (GA,GM) of graphs, decide whether f is t-equivalent to g or not. [ (P2)]For a given ordered pair (GA,GM) of graphs, decide whether the pair (GA,GM) is almighty or not. We show an (|E(GA)|+(|V(GM)|+|E(GA)|)|V(GA)|)-time algorithm for (P1), and prove the -completeness of (P2).
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.