Constraints on Cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background Power Spectrum of the 2500 deg2 SPT-SZ Survey

Abstract

We explore extensions to the cosmology using measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) from the recent SPT-SZ survey, along with data from WMAP7 and measurements of H0 and BAO. We check for consistency within between these datasets, and find some tension. The CMB alone gives weak support to physics beyond , due to a slight trend relative to of decreasing power towards smaller angular scales. While it may be due to statistical fluctuation, this trend could also be explained by several extensions. We consider running index (nrun), as well as two extensions that modify the damping tail power (the primordial helium abundance Yp and the effective number of neutrino species N eff) and one that modifies the large-scale power due to the ISW effect (the sum of neutrino masses Σ m). These extensions have similar observational consequences and are partially degenerate when considered simultaneously. Of the 6 one-parameter extensions considered, we find CMB to have the largest preference for nrun with -0.046<nrun<-0.003 at 95% confidence, which strengthens to a 2.7σ indication of nrun<0 from CMB+BAO+H0. Detectable non-zero nrun is difficult to explain in the context of single-field, slow-roll inflation models. We find N eff=3.620.48 for the CMB, which tightens to N eff=3.710.35 from CMB+BAO+H0. Larger values of N eff relieve the mild tension between CMB, BAO and H0. When the SZ selected galaxy cluster abundances (SPTCL) data are also included, we obtain N eff=3.290.31. Allowing for Σ m gives a 3σ detection of Σ m>0 from CMB+BAO+H0+SPTCL. The median value is (0.320.11) eV, a factor of six above the lower bound set by neutrino oscillation observations. ... [abridged]

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…