Decomposition and parity of p-adic representations attached to algebraic automorphic forms on GL(4)

Abstract

Let F be a number field with adele ring AF, and π an isobaric, algebraic automorphic representation of GL4(AF) of a fixed archimedean weight, which is quasi-regular, meaning that at every archimedean place v of F, the 4-dimensional representation σv of the Weil group WFv attached to πv is multiplicity free. Suppose there is an associated 4-dimensional, Hodge-Tate p-adic representation of the absolute Galois group GF, whose local L-factors agree with those of π (up to a shift) at almost all primes P of F. Then our first result is that the semisimplification of does not contain any irreducible 2-dimensional Galois representation which is even. The second result is that if π is regular and crystalline, then for sufficiently large p (see the article for a precise statement), the decomposition type of is the same as the isobaric type of π. A consequence is that is irreducible when π is cuspidal (and regular algebraic), which has also been proved by F. Calegari and T. Gee, in fact with no hypothesis on p. The third and final result, using Taylor's potential modularity theorem, is that given a pair (σ, σ') of odd, 2-dimensional p-adic representations of the same weight and distinct Hodge-Tate types, such that their direct sum is automorphic, the dimension of the GF-invariants of the tensor product η of the dual of σ with σ' equals, for large p, the order of pole at s=1 of the L-function of η (with the bad factors removed). This is as predicted by the Tate conjecture when σ, σ' occur in p-adic etale cohmology of smooth projective varieties over F, and it also provides a useful link to a small piece of the work of C. Skinner and E. Urban.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…