Millimeter dust emission compared with other mass estimates in N11 molecular clouds in the LMC

Abstract

CO and dust emission at millimeter wavelengths are independent tracers of cold interstellar matter, which have seldom been compared on the scale of GMCs in other galaxies. In this study, and for the first time in the Large Magellanic Cloud, we compute the molecular cloud masses from the mm emission of the dust and compare them with the masses derived from their CO luminosity and virial theorem. We present CO (J=1-0,2-1) and 1.2 mm continuum observations of the N11 star forming region in the LMC obtained with the SEST telescope and the SIMBA bolometer, respectively. We use the CO data to identify individual molecular clouds and measure their physical properties. The correlations between the properties of the N11 clouds are in agreement with those found in earlier studies in the LMC that sample a larger set of clouds and a larger range of cloud masses. For the N11 molecular clouds, we compare the masses estimated from the CO luminosity (Xco), the virial theorem (Mvir) and the millimeter dust luminosity (Ld). The measured ratios Lco/Mvir and Ld/Mvir constrain the Xco and Kd (dust emissivity at 1.2 mm per unit gas mass) parameters as a function of the virial parameter avir. The comparison between the different mass estimates yields a Xco-factor of 8.8x1020 cm-2/(K km s-1) x avir and a Kd parameter of 1.5x10-3 cm2/g x avir. We compare our N11 results with a similar analysis for molecular clouds in the Gould's Belt. We do not find in N11 a large discrepancy between the dust mm and virial masses as reported in earlier studies of molecular clouds in the SMC. The ratio between Ld and Mvir in N11 is half of that measured for Gould's Belt clouds, which can be accounted for by a factor of two lower gas-to-dust mass ratio, as the difference in gas metallicities. If the two samples have similar avir values, this result implies that their dust far-IR properties are also similar.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…