An Arithmetic Analogue of Fox's Triangle Removal Argument
Abstract
We give an arithmetic version of the recent proof of the triangle removal lemma by Fox [Fox11], for the group F2n. A triangle in F2n is a triple (x,y,z) such that x+y+z = 0. The triangle removal lemma for F2n states that for every ε > 0 there is a δ > 0, such that if a subset A of F2n requires the removal of at least ε · 2n elements to make it triangle-free, then it must contain at least δ · 22n triangles. This problem was first studied by Green [Gre05] who proved a lower bound on δ using an arithmetic regularity lemma. Regularity based lower bounds for triangle removal in graphs were recently improved by Fox and we give a direct proof of an analogous improvement for triangle removal in F2n. The improved lower bound was already known to follow (for triangle-removal in all groups), using Fox's removal lemma for directed cycles and a reduction by Kr\'al, Serra and Vena [KSV09] (see [Fox11,CF13]). The purpose of this note is to provide a direct Fourier-analytic proof for the group F2n.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.