On Fragments without Implications of both the Full Lambek Logic and some of its Substructural Extensions

Abstract

In this paper we study some fragments without implications of the (Hilbert) full Lambek logic HFL and also some fragments without implications of some of the substructural extensions of that logic. To do this, we perform an algebraic analysis of the Gentzen systems defined by the substructural calculi σ. Such systems are extensions of the full Lambek calculus with the rules codified by a subsequence, σ, of the sequence e wl wr c; where e stands for exchange, wl for left weakening, wr for right weakening, and c for contraction. We prove that these Gentzen systems (in languages without implications) are algebraizable by obtaining their equivalent algebraic semantics. All these classes of algebras are varieties of pointed semilatticed monoids and they can be embedded in their ideal completions. As a consequence of these results, we reveal that the fragments of the Gentzen systems associated with the calculi σ are the restrictions of them to the sublanguages considered, and we also reveal that in these languages, the fragments of the external systems associated with [σ] are the external systems associated with the restricted Gentzen systems (i.e., those obtained by restriction of σ] to the implication-less languages considered). We show that all these external systems without implication have algebraic semantics but they are not algebraizable (and are not even protoalgebraic). Results concerning fragments without implication of intuitionistic logic without contraction were already reported in Bou et al.(2006): On two fragments with negation and without implication of the logic of residuated lattices. Archive for Mathematical Logic 45(5) and in Adill\'on et al. (2007): On three implication-less fragments of t-norm based fuzzy logics. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 158(23).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…