Bounding sequence extremal functions with formations

Abstract

An (r, s)-formation is a concatenation of s permutations of r letters. If u is a sequence with r distinct letters, then let Ex(u, n) be the maximum length of any r-sparse sequence with n distinct letters which has no subsequence isomorphic to u. For every sequence u define fw(u), the formation width of u, to be the minimum s for which there exists r such that there is a subsequence isomorphic to u in every (r, s)-formation. We use fw(u) to prove upper bounds on Ex(u, n) for sequences u such that u contains an alternation with the same formation width as u. We generalize Nivasch's bounds on Ex((ab)t, n) by showing that fw((12 … l)t)=2t-1 and Ex((12… l)t, n) =n21(t-2)!α(n)t-2 O(α(n)t-3) for every l ≥ 2 and t≥ 3, such that α(n) denotes the inverse Ackermann function. Upper bounds on Ex((12 … l)t , n) have been used in other papers to bound the maximum number of edges in k-quasiplanar graphs on n vertices with no pair of edges intersecting in more than O(1) points. If u is any sequence of the form a v a v' a such that a is a letter, v is a nonempty sequence excluding a with no repeated letters and v' is obtained from v by only moving the first letter of v to another place in v, then we show that fw(u)=4 and Ex(u, n) =(nα(n)). Furthermore we prove that fw(abc(acb)t)=2t+1 and Ex(abc(acb)t, n) = n21(t-1)!α(n)t-1 O(α(n)t-2) for every t≥ 2.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…