Capacity of Non-Malleable Codes
Abstract
Non-malleable codes, introduced by Dziembowski, Pietrzak and Wichs (ICS 2010), encode messages s in a manner so that tampering the codeword causes the decoder to either output s or a message that is independent of s. While this is an impossible goal to achieve against unrestricted tampering functions, rather surprisingly non-malleable coding becomes possible against every fixed family F of tampering functions that is not too large (for instance, when |F| (2α n) for some α ∈ [0, 1) where n is the number of bits in a codeword). In this work, we study the "capacity of non-malleable coding", and establish optimal bounds on the achievable rate as a function of the family size, answering an open problem from Dziembowski et al. (ICS 2010). Specifically, 1. We prove that for every family F with |F| (2α n), there exist non-malleable codes against F with rate arbitrarily close to 1-α (this is achieved w.h.p. by a randomized construction). 2. We show the existence of families of size (nO(1) 2α n) against which there is no non-malleable code of rate 1-α (in fact this is the case w.h.p for a random family of this size). 3. We also show that 1-α is the best achievable rate for the family of functions which are only allowed to tamper the first α n bits of the codeword, which is of special interest. As a corollary, this implies that the capacity of non-malleable coding in the split-state model (where the tampering function acts independently but arbitrarily on the two halves of the codeword) equals 1/2. We also give an efficient Monte Carlo construction of codes of rate close to 1 with polynomial time encoding and decoding that is non-malleable against any fixed c > 0 and family F of size (nc), in particular tampering functions with, say, cubic size circuits.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.