On Removable Sets For Convex Functions
Abstract
In the present article we provide a sufficient condition for a closed set F in Rd to have the following property which we call c-removability: Whenever a function f:Rd->R is locally convex on the complement of F, it is convex on the whole Rd. We also prove that no generalized rectangle of positive Lebesgue measure in R2 is c-removable. Our results also answer the following question asked in an article by Jacek Tabor and Jozef Tabor [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 365 (2010)]: Assume the closed set F in Rd is such that any locally convex function defined on Rd has a unique convex extension on Rd. Is F necessarily intervally thin (a notion of smallness of sets defined by their "essential transparency" in every direction)? We prove the answer is negative by finding a counterexample in R2.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.