Quantification of errors in large-eddy simulations of a spatially-evolving mixing layer

Abstract

A stochastic approach based on generalized Polynomial Chaos (gPC) is used to quantify the error in Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) of a spatially-evolving mixing layer flow and its sensitivity to different simulation parameters, viz. the grid stretching in the streamwise and lateral directions and the subgrid scale model constant (CS). The error is evaluated with respect to the results of a highly resolved LES (HRLES) and for different quantities of interest, namely the mean streamwise velocity, the momentum thickness and the shear stress. A typical feature of the considered spatially evolving flow is the progressive transition from a laminar regime, highly dependent on the inlet conditions, to a fully-developed turbulent one. Therefore the computational domain is divided in two different zones (inlet dependent and fully turbulent) and the gPC error analysis is carried out for these two zones separately. An optimization of the parameters is also carried out for both these zones. For all the considered quantities, the results point out that the error is mainly governed by the value of the CS constant. At the end of the inlet-dependent zone a strong coupling between the normal stretching ratio and the CS value is observed. The error sensitivity to the parameter values is significantly larger in the inlet-dependent upstream region; however, low error values can be obtained in this region for all the considered physical quantities by an ad-hoc tuning of the parameters. Conversely, in the turbulent regime the error is globally lower and less sensitive to the parameter variations, but it is more difficult to find a set of parameter values leading to optimal results for all the analyzed physical quantities.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…