Magnetic response of Pr1-xLaCexCuO4 in comparison with hole-doped cuprates
Abstract
The origin of differences in the magnetic responses of Pr1-xLaCexCuO4 with x=0.11-0.12 and moderately doped p-type cuprates is investigated using the t-J model, the Mori projection operator technique and dispersions of charge carriers derived from photoemission experiments. These differences are related to the proximity of the former crystal to the boundary of the antiferromagnetic phase and to the remoteness of p-type compounds from it. This leads to different nesting vectors of the low-frequency equi-energy contours of carrier dispersions in these crystals. The strong nesting with the antiferromagnetic momentum as the nesting vector produces the commensurate low-frequency response and the coexistence of two spin-excitation branches in Pr1-xLaCexCuO4, while incommensurate nesting vectors in p-type crystals lead to the incommensurate low-frequency response and the hourglass dispersion of susceptibility maxima.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.