An Analogue of the Hilton-Milner Theorem for weak compositions
Abstract
Let N0 be the set of non-negative integers, and let P(n,l) denote the set of all weak compositions of n with l parts, i.e., P(n,l)=\ (x1,x2,…, xl)∈ N0l\ :\ x1+x2+·s+xl=n\. For any element u=(u1,u2,…, ul)∈ P(n,l), denote its ith-coordinate by u(i), i.e., u(i)=ui. A family A⊂eq P(n,l) is said to be t-intersecting if \ i \ :\ u(i)= v(i)\ ≥ t for all u, v∈ A. A family A⊂eq P(n,l) is said to be trivially t-intersecting if there is a t-set T of \1,2,…,l\ and elements ys∈ N0 (s∈ T) such that A= \ u∈ P(n,l)\ :\ u(j)=yj\ for all\ j∈ T\. We prove that given any positive integers l,t with l≥ 2t+3, there exists a constant n0(l,t) depending only on l and t, such that for all n≥ n0(l,t), if A ⊂eq P(n,l) is non-trivially t-intersecting then equation A ≤ n+l-t-1 l-t-1-n-1 l-t-1+t. equation Moreover, equality holds if and only if there is a t-set T of \1,2,…,l\ such that equation A=s∈ \1,2,…, l\ T As \ qi\ :\ i∈ T \, equation where align As & =\ u∈ P(n,l)\ :\ u(j)=0\ for all\ j∈ T\ and\ u(s)=0\ align and qi∈ P(n,l) with qi(j)=0 for all j∈ \1,2,…, l\ \i\ and qi(i)=n.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.