A Sufficient Condition for Disproving Descartes's Conjecture on Odd Perfect Numbers

Abstract

Let σ(x) be the sum of the divisors of x. If N is odd and σ(N) = 2N, then the odd perfect number N is said to be given in Eulerian form if N = qkn2 where q is prime with q k 1 4 and (q,n) = 1. In this note, we show that q < n implies that Descartes's conjecture (previously Sorli's conjecture), k = q(N) = 1, is not true. This then implies an unconditional proof for the biconditional k = q(N) = 1 n < q. Lastly, following a recent result of Cohen and Sorli, we show that if q < n, then either q > 5 or k > 5 is true. (Note: This is withdrawn for now because this paper is currently a work in progress.)

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…