Deterministic Approximate Counting for Juntas of Degree-2 Polynomial Threshold Functions

Abstract

Let g: \-1,1\k \-1,1\ be any Boolean function and q1,…,qk be any degree-2 polynomials over \-1,1\n. We give a deterministic algorithm which, given as input explicit descriptions of g,q1,…,qk and an accuracy parameter >0, approximates \[x \-1,1\n[g((q1(x)),…,(qk(x)))=1]\] to within an additive . For any constant > 0 and k ≥ 1 the running time of our algorithm is a fixed polynomial in n. This is the first fixed polynomial-time algorithm that can deterministically approximately count satisfying assignments of a natural class of depth-3 Boolean circuits. Our algorithm extends a recent result DDS13:deg2count which gave a deterministic approximate counting algorithm for a single degree-2 polynomial threshold function (q(x)), corresponding to the k=1 case of our result. Our algorithm and analysis requires several novel technical ingredients that go significantly beyond the tools required to handle the k=1 case in DDS13:deg2count. One of these is a new multidimensional central limit theorem for degree-2 polynomials in Gaussian random variables which builds on recent Malliavin-calculus-based results from probability theory. We use this CLT as the basis of a new decomposition technique for k-tuples of degree-2 Gaussian polynomials and thus obtain an efficient deterministic approximate counting algorithm for the Gaussian distribution. Finally, a third new ingredient is a "regularity lemma" for k-tuples of degree-d polynomial threshold functions. This generalizes both the regularity lemmas of DSTW:10,HKM:09 and the regularity lemma of Gopalan et al GOWZ10. Our new regularity lemma lets us extend our deterministic approximate counting results from the Gaussian to the Boolean domain.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…