On a conjecture about tricyclic graphs with maximal energy

Abstract

For a given simple graph G, the energy of G, denoted by E(G), is defined as the sum of the absolute values of all eigenvalues of its adjacency matrix, which was defined by I. Gutman. The problem on determining the maximal energy tends to be complicated for a given class of graphs. There are many approaches on the maximal energy of trees, unicyclic graphs and bicyclic graphs, respectively. Let P6,6,6n denote the graph with n≥ 20 vertices obtained from three copies of C6 and a path Pn-18 by adding a single edge between each of two copies of C6 to one endpoint of the path and a single edge from the third C6 to the other endpoint of the Pn-18. Very recently, Aouchiche et al. [M. Aouchiche, G. Caporossi, P. Hansen, Open problems on graph eigenvalues studied with AutoGraphiX, Europ. J. Comput. Optim. 1(2013), 181--199] put forward the following conjecture: Let G be a tricyclic graphs on n vertices with n=20 or n≥22, then E(G)≤ E(Pn6,6,6) with equality if and only if G Pn6,6,6. Let G(n;a,b,k) denote the set of all connected bipartite tricyclic graphs on n vertices with three vertex-disjoint cycles Ca, Cb and Ck, where n≥ 20. In this paper, we try to prove that the conjecture is true for graphs in the class G∈ G(n;a,b,k), but as a consequence we can only show that this is true for most of the graphs in the class except for 9 families of such graphs.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…