On the Complexity of Making a Distinguished Vertex Minimum or Maximum Degree by Vertex Deletion

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the approximability of two node deletion problems. Given a vertex weighted graph G=(V,E) and a specified, or "distinguished" vertex p ∈ V, MDD(min) is the problem of finding a minimum weight vertex set S ⊂eq V \p\ such that p becomes the minimum degree vertex in G[V S]; and MDD(max) is the problem of finding a minimum weight vertex set S ⊂eq V \p\ such that p becomes the maximum degree vertex in G[V S]. These are known NP-complete problems and have been studied from the parameterized complexity point of view in previous work. Here, we prove that for any ε > 0, both the problems cannot be approximated within a factor (1 - ε) n, unless NP ⊂eq DTIME(n n). We also show that for any ε > 0, MDD(min) cannot be approximated within a factor (1 -ε) n on bipartite graphs, unless NP ⊂eq DTIME(n n), and that for any ε > 0, MDD(max) cannot be approximated within a factor (1/2 - ε) n on bipartite graphs, unless NP ⊂eq DTIME(n n). We give an O( n) factor approximation algorithm for MDD(max) on general graphs, provided the degree of p is O( n). We then show that if the degree of p is n-O( n), a similar result holds for MDD(min). We prove that MDD(max) is APX-complete on 3-regular unweighted graphs and provide an approximation algorithm with ratio 1.583 when G is a 3-regular unweighted graph. In addition, we show that MDD(min) can be solved in polynomial time when G is a regular graph of constant degree.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…