Higher Spin AdSd+1/CFTd at One Loop

Abstract

Following arXiv:1308.2337, we carry out one loop tests of higher spin AdSd+1/CFTd correspondences for d≥ 2. The Vasiliev theories in AdSd+1, which contain each integer spin once, are related to the U(N) singlet sector of the d-dimensional CFT of N free complex scalar fields; the minimal theories containing each even spin once -- to the O(N) singlet sector of the CFT of N free real scalar fields. Using analytic continuation of higher spin zeta functions, which naturally regulate the spin sums, we calculate one loop vacuum energies in Euclidean AdSd+1. In even d we compare the result with the O(N0) correction to the a-coefficient of the Weyl anomaly; in odd d -- with the O(N0) correction to the free energy F on the d-dimensional sphere. For the theories of integer spins, the correction vanishes in agreement with the CFT of N free complex scalars. For the minimal theories, the correction always equals the contribution of one real conformal scalar field in d dimensions. As explained in arXiv:1308.2337, this result may agree with the O(N) singlet sector of the theory of N real scalar fields, provided the coupling constant in the higher spin theory is identified as GN 1/(N-1). Our calculations in even d are closely related to finding the regularized a-anomalies of conformal higher spin theories. In each even d we identify two such theories with vanishing a-anomaly: a theory of all integer spins, and a theory of all even spins coupled to a complex conformal scalar. We also discuss an interacting UV fixed point in d=5 obtained from the free scalar theory via an irrelevant double-trace quartic interaction. This interacting large N theory is dual to the Vasiliev theory in AdS6 where the bulk scalar is quantized with the alternate boundary condition.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…