Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures II: the bipartite case
Abstract
In a sequence of four papers, we prove the following results (via a unified approach) for all sufficiently large n: (i) [1-factorization conjecture] Suppose that n is even and D ≥ 2 n/4 -1. Then every D-regular graph G on n vertices has a decomposition into perfect matchings. Equivalently, '(G)=D. (ii) [Hamilton decomposition conjecture] Suppose that D n/2 . Then every D-regular graph G on n vertices has a decomposition into Hamilton cycles and at most one perfect matching. (iii) [Optimal packings of Hamilton cycles] Suppose that G is a graph on n vertices with minimum degree δ n/2. Then G contains at least reg even(n,δ)/2 (n-2)/8 edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles. Here reg even(n,δ) denotes the degree of the largest even-regular spanning subgraph one can guarantee in a graph on n vertices with minimum degree δ. According to Dirac, (i) was first raised in the 1950s. (ii) and the special case δ= n/2 of (iii) answer questions of Nash-Williams from 1970. All of the above bounds are best possible. In the current paper, we prove the above results for the case when G is close to a complete balanced bipartite graph.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.