On graphs with representation number 3

Abstract

A graph G=(V,E) is word-representable if there exists a word w over the alphabet V such that letters x and y alternate in w if and only if (x,y) is an edge in E. A graph is word-representable if and only if it is k-word-representable for some k, that is, if there exists a word containing k copies of each letter that represents the graph. Also, being k-word-representable implies being (k+1)-word-representable. The minimum k such that a word-representable graph is k-word-representable, is called graph's representation number. Graphs with representation number 1 are complete graphs, while graphs with representation number 2 are circle graphs. The only fact known before this paper on the class of graphs with representation number 3, denoted by R3, is that the Petersen graph and triangular prism belong to this class. In this paper, we show that any prism belongs to R3, and that two particular operations of extending graphs preserve the property of being in R3. Further, we show that R3 is not included in a class of c-colorable graphs for a constant c. To this end, we extend three known results related to operations on graphs. We also show that ladder graphs used in the study of prisms are 2-word-representable, and thus each ladder graph is a circle graph. Finally, we discuss k-word-representing comparability graphs via consideration of crown graphs, where we state some problems for further research.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…