One more word on the flicker noise in manganites
Abstract
It is shown that the conclusion of the Comment by C.Barone et al. [J. Appl. Phys. Vol.115, 116101 (2014)] on the paper [J. Appl. Phys. Vol.113, 094901 (2013)] is a result of several flaws including incorrect assumption that the charge carrier mobility in La2/3Sr1/3MnO3 is independent of temperature, and misinterpretation of the quantum theory of flicker noise. An experimental evidence for strong temperature dependence of the carrier mobility in the metallic state of manganites is given, and prospects for explaining the experimental data given in the Comment are discussed.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.