On Seymour's Decomposition Theorem
Abstract
Let M be a class of matroids closed under minors and isomorphism. Let N be a matroid in M with an exact k-separation (A, B). We say N is a k-decomposer for M having (A, B) as an inducer, if every matroid M∈ M having N as a minor has a k-separation (X, Y) such that, A⊂eq X and B⊂eq Y. Seymour [3, 9.1] proved that a matroid N is a k-decomposer for an excluded-minor class, if certain conditions are met for all 3-connected matroids M in the class, where |E(M)-E(N)| 2. We reinterpret Seymour's Theorem in terms of the connectivity function and give a check-list that is easier to implement because case-checking is reduced.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.