Birational classification of fields of invariants for groups of order 128

Abstract

Let G be a finite group acting on the rational function field C(xg : g∈ G) by C-automorphisms h(xg)=xhg for any g,h∈ G. Noether's problem asks whether the invariant field C(G)=k(xg : g∈ G)G is rational (i.e. purely transcendental) over C. Saltman and Bogomolov, respectively, showed that for any prime p there exist groups G of order p9 and of order p6 such that C(G) is not rational over C by showing the non-vanishing of the unramified Brauer group: Brnr(C(G))≠ 0. For p=2, Chu, Hu, Kang and Prokhorov proved that if G is a 2-group of order ≤ 32, then C(G) is rational over C. Chu, Hu, Kang and Kunyavskii showed that if G is of order 64, then C(G) is rational over C except for the groups G belonging to the two isoclinism families 13 and 16. Bogomolov and B\"ohning's theorem claims that if G1 and G2 belong to the same isoclinism family, then C(G1) and C(G2) are stably C-isomorphic. We investigate the birational classification of C(G) for groups G of order 128 with Brnr(C(G))≠ 0. Moravec showed that there exist exactly 220 groups G of order 128 with Brnr(C(G))≠ 0 forming 11 isoclinism families j. We show that if G1 and G2 belong to 16, 31, 37, 39, 43, 58, 60 or 80 (resp. 106 or 114), then C(G1) and C(G2) are stably C-isomorphic with Brnr(C(Gi)) C2. Explicit structures of non-rational fields C(G) are given for each cases including also the case 30 with Brnr(C(G)) C2× C2.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…