Towards Tight Bounds on Theta-Graphs

Abstract

We present improved upper and lower bounds on the spanning ratio of θ-graphs with at least six cones. Given a set of points in the plane, a θ-graph partitions the plane around each vertex into m disjoint cones, each having aperture θ=2π/m, and adds an edge to the `closest' vertex in each cone. We show that for any integer k ≥ 1, θ-graphs with 4k+2 cones have a spanning ratio of 1+2(θ/2) and we provide a matching lower bound, showing that this spanning ratio tight. Next, we show that for any integer k ≥ 1, θ-graphs with 4k+4 cones have spanning ratio at most 1+2(θ/2)/((θ/2)-(θ/2)). We also show that θ-graphs with 4k+3 and 4k+5 cones have spanning ratio at most (θ/4)/((θ/2)-(3θ/4)). This is a significant improvement on all families of θ-graphs for which exact bounds are not known. For example, the spanning ratio of the θ-graph with 7 cones is decreased from at most 7.5625 to at most 3.5132. These spanning proofs also imply improved upper bounds on the competitiveness of the θ-routing algorithm. In particular, we show that the θ-routing algorithm is (1+2(θ/2)/((θ/2)-(θ/2)))-competitive on θ-graphs with 4k+4 cones and that this ratio is tight. Finally, we present improved lower bounds on the spanning ratio of these graphs. Using these bounds, we provide a partial order on these families of θ-graphs. In particular, we show that θ-graphs with 4k+4 cones have spanning ratio at least 1+2(θ/2)+22(θ/2). This is somewhat surprising since, for equal values of k, the spanning ratio of θ-graphs with 4k+4 cones is greater than that of θ-graphs with 4k+2 cones, showing that increasing the number of cones can make the spanning ratio worse.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…