Linearization stability results and active measurements for the Einstein-scalar field equations

Abstract

We study the Einstein equations coupled with the scalar field equations, Ein(g)=T, T=T(g,φ)+F1, and gφ-m2φ= F2, where the sources F=(F1, F2) correspond to perturbations of the physical fields which we control. Here φ=(φ)=1L and (M,g) is a 4-dimensional globally hyperbolic Lorentzian manifold. The sources F need to be such that the fields (g,φ,F) satisfy the conservation law divg(T)=0. If (gε,φε) solves the above equations, g=∂ε gε|ε=0, φ=φε|ε=0, and f=(f1,f2)= ∂ε Fε|ε=0 solve the linearized Einstein equations and the linearized conservation law 12 gpk ∇p f1kj+ Σ=1L f2 \, ∂jφ=0, where g= gε|ε=0 and φ= φε|ε=0. Then ( g, φ) and f have the linearization stability property. Here ask the converse: If g, φ, and f solve the linearized Einstein equations and the linearized conservation law, are there Fε=(F1ε,F2ε) and (gε,φε) depending on ε∈ [0,ε0), ε0>0, such that (gε,φε) solves the Einstein-scalar field equations and the conservation law. When g and φ vary enough and L≥ 5, we prove a microlocal version of this: When Y⊂ M is a 2-surface and (y,η)∈ N*Y, there is f that is a conormal distibutions wrt. the surface Y with a given principal symbol at (y,η) such that ( g, φ) and f have the linearization stability property.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…