Turbulent Particle Pair Diffusion, Locality Versus Non-locality: Numerical Simulations

Abstract

Particle pair (relative) diffusion in a field of homogeneous turbulence with generalised power-law energy spectra, E(k) k-p for 1< p 3 and k1 k kη with kη/k1=106, is investigated numerically using Kinematic Simulation (Kraichnan 1970, Fung et al 1992). If =| x2(t)- x1(t)| and σ=2, (the angled brackets is the ensemble average over particle pairs), then we find that: (1) The pair diffusivity scales like Dp σγp with γp obtained from the simulations such that γlp<γp<2, where γlp =(1+p)/2 is the Richardson locality scaling. The range of over which these scalings are observed diminishes from above and from below as p increases towards 3.\\ (2) M(p)=γp/γlp>1 in the range 1<p<3, and M has a peak at pm≈ 1.8. This suggests that for spectra close to this in the range 1.5<p<2, which includes Kolmogorov turbulence, local and non-local correlations play comparable roles in the pair diffusion process.\\ (3) The mean square separation scales like 2p τpp where p=1/(1-γp/2) and τp is an adjusted travel time.\\ (4) For Kolmogorov turbulence p=5/3, we observe D5/3 σ1.53, and 25/3τ4.2. \\ (5) At p*≈ 1.4 (E(k) k-1.4) we observe Dp*σ4/3, and 2p*τ3; these are different to the Richardson 4/3-law and Richardson-Obukov t3-regime which occur for p=5/3. These results are consistent with Malik's (2014) theory, and supports the principle upon which the theory is based that both local and non-local correlations are effective in the pair diffusion process inside the inertial subrange.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…