A tightness criterion for homology manifolds with or without boundary

Abstract

A simplicial complex X is said to be tight with respect to a field F if X is connected and, for every induced subcomplex Y of X, the linear map H (Y; F) → H (X; F) (induced by the inclusion map) is injective. This notion was introduced by K\"uhnel in [10]. In this paper we prove the following two combinatorial criteria for tightness. (a) Any (k+1)-neighbourly k-stacked F-homology manifold with boundary is F-tight. Also, (b) any F-orientable (k+1)-neighbourly k-stacked F-homology manifold without boundary is F-tight, at least if its dimension is not equal to 2k+1. The result (a) appears to be the first criterion to be found for tightness of (homology) manifolds with boundary. Since every (k+1)-neighbourly k-stacked manifold without boundary is, by definition, the boundary of a (k+1)-neighbourly k-stacked manifold with boundary - and since we now know several examples (including two infinite families) of triangulations from the former class - theorem (a) provides us with many examples of tight triangulated manifolds with boundary. The second result (b) generalizes a similar result from [2] which was proved for a class of combinatorial manifolds without boundary. We believe that theorem (b) is valid for dimension 2k+1 as well. Except for this lacuna, this result answers a recent question of Effenberger [8] affirmatively.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…