Heaps and Two Exponential Structures

Abstract

Take Q=( Q1, Q2,…) to be an exponential structure and M(n) to be the number of minimal elements of Qn where M(0)=1. Then a sequence of numbers \rn( Qn)\n 1 is defined by the equation eqnarray* Σn 1rn( Qn)znn!\,M(n)=-(Σn 0(-1)nznn!\,M(n)). eqnarray* Let Qn denote the poset Qn with a 0 adjoined and let 1 denote the unique maximal element in the poset Qn. Furthermore, let μ Qn be the M\"obius function on the poset Qn. Stanley proved that rn( Qn)=(-1)nμ Qn(0,1). This implies that the numbers rn( Qn) are integers. In this paper, we study the cases Qn=n(r) and Qn= Qn(r) where n(r) and Qn(r) are posets, respectively, of set partitions of [rn] whose block sizes are divisible by r and of r-partitions of [n]. In both cases we prove that rn(n(r)) and rn( Qn(r)) enumerate the pyramids by applying the Cartier-Foata monoid identity and further prove that rn(n(r)) is the generalized Euler number Ern-1 and that rn( Qn(2)) is the number of complete non-ambiguous trees of size 2n-1 by bijections. This gives a new proof of Welker's theorem that rn(n(r))=Ern-1 and implies the construction of r-dimensional complete non-ambiguous trees. As a bonus of applying the theory of heaps, we establish a bijection between the set of complete non-ambiguous forests and the set of pairs of permutations with no common rise. This answers an open question raised by Aval et al..

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…