Floergsbord

Abstract

In this thesis, we prove several results concerning field-theoretic invariants of knots and 3-manifolds. In Chapter 2, for any knot K in a closed, oriented 3-manifold M, we use SU(2) representation spaces and the Lagrangian field theory framework of Wehrheim and Woodward to define a new homological knot invariant S(K). We then use a result of Ivan Smith to show that when K is a (1,1) knot in S3 (a set of knots which includes torus knots, for example), the rank of S(K) C agrees with the rank of knot Floer homology, HFK(K) C, and we conjecture that this holds in general for any knot K. In Chapter 3, we prove a somewhat strange result, giving a purely topological formula for the Jones polynomial of a 2-bridge knot K⊂ S3. First, for any lens space L(p,q), we combine the d-invariants from Heegaard Floer homology with certain Atiyah-Patodi-Singer/Casson-Gordon -invariants to define a function Ip,q: Z/pZ Z Let K = K(p,q) denote the 2-bridge knot in S3 whose double-branched cover is L(p,q), let σ(K) denote the knot signature, and let O denote the set of relative orientations of K, which has cardinality 2(\# of components of K) - 1. Then we prove the following formula for the Jones polynomial J(K): i-σ(K)q3σ(K)J(K)= Σo∈O(iq)2σ(Ko) +(q-1-q1)Σs∈Z/pZ(iq)Ip,q(s) (here, i = -1). In Chapter 4, we present joint work with Adam Levine, concerning Heegaard Floer homology and the orderability of fundamental groups. Namely, we prove that if CF(M) is particularly simple, i.e., M is what we call a "strong L-space," then π1(M) is not left-orderable.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…