The Error Term in the Sato-Tate Conjecture
Abstract
Let f(z)=Σn=1∞ a(n)e2π i nz∈ Sknew(0(N)) be a newform of even weight k≥2 that does not have complex multiplication. Then a(n)∈R for all n, so for any prime p, there exists θp∈[0,π] such that a(p)=2p(k-1)/2(θp). Let π(x)=\#\p≤ x\. For a given subinterval I⊂[0,π], the now-proven Sato-Tate Conjecture tells us that as x∞, \[ \#\p≤ x:θp∈ I\ μST(I)π(x), μST(I)=∫I 2π2(θ)~dθ. \] Let ε>0. Assuming that the symmetric power L-functions of f are automorphic, we prove that as x∞, \[ \#\p≤ x:θp∈ I\=μST(I)π(x)+O(x( x)9/8-ε), \] where the implied constant is effectively computable and depends only on k,N, and ε.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.