On the constants of the Bohnenblust-Hille inequality and Hardy--Littlewood inequalities
Abstract
In this paper, among other results, we improve the best known estimates for the constants of the generalized Bohnenblust-Hille inequality. These enhancements are then used to improve the best known constants of the Hardy--Littlewood inequality; this inequality asserts that for a positive integer m≥2 with 2m≤ p≤∞ and K=R or C there exists a constant Cm,pK≥1 such that, for all continuous m--linear forms T:pn×·s×pn→K, and all positive integers n,% \[ ( Σj1,...,jm=1n T(ej1,...,ejm% ) 2mpmp+p-2m) mp+p-2m2mp≤ Cm,pK T , \] and the exponent 2mpmp+p-2m is sharp. In particular, we show that for p > 2m3-4m2+2m the optimal constants satisfying the above inequality are dominated by the best known estimates for the constants of the m-linear Bohnenblust--Hille inequality. More precisely if γ denotes the Euler--Mascheroni constant, considering the case of complex scalars as an illustration, we show that% \[ Cm,pC≤Πj=2m( 2-1% j) j2-2j<m1-γ2, \] which is somewhat surprising since this new formula has no dependence on p (the former estimate depends on p but, paradoxally, is worse than this new one). This suggests the following open problems: 1) Are the optimal constants of the Hardy--Littlewood inequality and Bohnenblust--Hille inequalities the same? 2) Are the optimal constants of the Hardy--Littlewood inequality independent of p (at least for large p)?
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.