Contractivity, Complete Contractivity and Curvature inequalities

Abstract

Let \|·\| A be a norm on Cm given by the formula \|(z1,…,zm)\| A=\|z1A1+·s+zmAm\| op for some choice of an m-tuple of n× n linearly independent matrices A=(A1, …, Am). Let A⊂ Cm be the unit ball with respect to the norm \|·\| A. %For a holomorphic function f on A, let %V(f):= ( %smallmatrix %f(w)Ip& Σi=1m ∂if(w)Vi \\ %0 & f(w)Iq %smallmatrix ), where V1, …, Vm are p× q %matrices. Given p× q matrices V1, …, Vm and a function f ∈ O( A), the algebra of function holomorphic on an open set U containing the closed unit ball A define V(f):= ( smallmatrix f(w)Ip& Σi=1m ∂if(w)Vi \\ 0 & f(w)Iq smallmatrix ), w∈ A. Clearly, V defines an algebra homomorphism. We study contractivity (resp. complete contractivity) of such homomorphisms. The characterization of those balls in C2 for which contractive linear maps are always completely contractive remained open. We answer this question for balls of the form A in C2. The class of homomorphisms of the form V arise from localization of operators in the Cowen-Douglas class of . The (complete) contractivity of a homomorphism in this class naturally produces inequalities for the curvature of the corresponding Cowen-Douglas bundle. This connection and some of its very interesting consequences are discussed.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…