A bound for the diameter of random hyperbolic graphs
Abstract
Random hyperbolic graphs were recently introduced by Krioukov et. al. [KPKVB10] as a model for large networks. Gugelmann, Panagiotou, and Peter [GPP12] then initiated the rigorous study of random hyperbolic graphs using the following model: for α> 12, C∈R, n∈N, set R=2 n+C and build the graph G=(V,E) with |V|=n as follows: For each v∈ V, generate i.i.d. polar coordinates (rv,θv) using the joint density function f(r,θ), with θv chosen uniformly from [0,2π) and rv with density f(r)=α(α r)(α R)-1 for 0≤ r< R. Then, join two vertices by an edge, if their hyperbolic distance is at most R. We prove that in the range 12 < α < 1 a.a.s. for any two vertices of the same component, their graph distance is O(C0+1+o(1)n), where C0=2/(12-34α+α24), thus answering a question raised in [GPP12] concerning the diameter of such random graphs. As a corollary from our proof we obtain that the second largest component has size O(2C0+1+o(1)n), thus answering a question of Bode, Fountoulakis and M\"uller [BFM13]. We also show that a.a.s. there exist isolated components forming a path of length ( n), thus yielding a lower bound on the size of the second largest component.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.