Steps towards a classification of Cr-generic dynamics close to homoclinic points

Abstract

We present here the first part of a program for a classification of the generic dynamics close to homoclinic and heteroclinic points, in the Cr topologies, r≥ 1. This paper only contains announcements and a few sketches of proofs; a forthcoming series of papers will present the proofs in details. The two prototypical examples of non-hyperbolic dynamics are homoclinic tangencies and heterodimensional cycles. Palis conjectured that they actually characterize densely non-hyperbolic dynamics. It is therefore important to understand what happens close to those bifurcations. We generalize classical results of Newhouse, Palis and Viana, for both tangencies and cycles: close to a homoclinic tangency or to a heterodimensional cycle there is abundance of diffeomorphisms exhibiting infinitely many sinks or sources if and only if the dynamics is not volume-hyperbolic. This proves in particular a conjecture of Turaev for homoclinic tangencies. An important result of Bonatti, Diaz, Pujals states that if a homoclinic class is C1-robustly without dominated splitting, then nearby diffeomorphisms exhibit C1-generically infinitely many sinks or sources. We show that this holds in higher regularities, under the further assumption that non-dominations are obtained through so-called "mechanisms". This includes all the examples of robustly non-dominated homoclinic classes one can build with the tools known up to now. We actually have a Cr-equivalent of a recent C1-result of Bochi and Bonatti: we describe precisely the Lyapunov exponents along periodic points that may appear close to a homoclinic tangency or to a homoclinic class. The results of Newhouse, Palis and Viana were proven for the Cr topologies, r≥ 2. Our results hold also in the C1+α topologies.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…