Sparse Multipartite Graphs as Partition Universal for Graphs of Bounded-Degrees
Abstract
For graphs G and H, let G (H,H) signify that any red/blue edge coloring of G contains a monochromatic H as a subgraph, and H(,n)=\H:|V(H)|=n,(H) \. For fixed and n, we say that G is a partition universal graph for H(,n) if G (H,H) for every H∈H(,n). In 1983, Chv\'atal, R\"odl, Szemer\'edi and Trotter proved that for any 2 there exists a constant B such that, for any n, if N Bn then KN is partition universal for H(,n). Recently, Kohayakawa, R\"odl, Schacht and Szemer\'edi proved that the complete graph KN in above result can be replaced by sparse graphs. They obtained that for fixed 2, there exist constants B and C such that if N Bn and p=C( N/N)1/, then a.a.s. G(N,p) is partition universal graph for H(,n), where G(N,p) is the standard random graph on N vertices with P(e)=p for each edge e. From some results of Bollob\'as and uczak, we know that a.a.s. (G(N,p)) = ((N/ N)1-1/). In this paper, we shall show that the G(N,p) in above result can be replaced by random multipartite graph. Let Kr(N) be the complete r-partite graph with N vertices in each part, and Gr(N,p) the random spanning subgraph of Kr(N), in which each edge appears with probability p. It is shown that for fixed 2 there exist constants r, B and C depending only on such that if N Bn and p=C( N/N)1/, then a.a.s. Gr(N,p) is partition universal graph for H(,n). The proof mainly uses the sparse multipartite regularity lemma.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.