Representing Graphs via Pattern Avoiding Words

Abstract

The notion of a word-representable graph has been studied in a series of papers in the literature. A graph G=(V,E) is word-representable if there exists a word w over the alphabet V such that letters x and y alternate in w if and only if xy is an edge in E. If V =\1, …, n\, this is equivalent to saying that G is word-representable if for all x,y ∈ \1, …, n\, xy ∈ E if and only if the subword w\x,y\ of w consisting of all occurrences of x or y in w has no consecutive occurrence of the pattern 11. In this paper, we introduce the study of u-representable graphs for any word u ∈ \1,2\*. A graph G is u-representable if and only if there is a labeled version of G, G=(\1, …, n\, E), and a word w ∈ \1, …, n\* such that for all x,y ∈ \1, …, n\, xy ∈ E if and only if w\x,y\ has no consecutive occurrence of the pattern u. Thus, word-representable graphs are just 11-representable graphs. We show that for any k ≥ 3, every finite graph G is 1k-representable. This contrasts with the fact that not all graphs are 11-representable graphs. The main focus of the paper is the study of 12-representable graphs. In particular, we classify the 12-representable trees. We show that any 12-representable graph is a comparability graph and the class of 12-representable graphs include the classes of co-interval graphs and permutation graphs. We also state a number of facts on 12-representation of induced subgraphs of a grid graph.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…