Optimal results for the fractional heat equation involving the Hardy potential

Abstract

In this paper we study the influence of the Hardy potential in the fractional heat equation. In particular, we consider the problem (Pθ) \ arrayrcl ut+(-)s u&=&\,u|x|2s+θ up+ c f in × (0,T),\\ u(x,t)&>&0∈n × (0,T),\\ u(x,t)&=&0∈n ()×[ 0,T),\\ u(x,0)&=&u0(x) if x∈, array . where N> 2s, 0<s<1, (-)s is the fractional Laplacian of order 2s, p>1, c,>0, u0 0, f 0 are in a suitable class of functions and θ=\0,1\. Notice that (P0) is a linear problem, while (P1) is a semilinear problem. The main features in the article are: enumerate Optimal results about existence and instantaneous and complete blow up in the linear problem (P0), where the best constant N,s in the fractional Hardy inequality provides the threshold between existence and nonexistence. Similar results in the local heat equation were obtained by Baras and Goldstein in BaGo. However, in the fractional setting the arguments are much more involved and they require the proof of a weak Harnack inequality for a weighted operator that appear in a natural way. Once this Harnack inequality is obtained, the optimal results follow as a simpler consequence than in the classical case. The existence of a critical power p+(s,λ) in the semilinear problem (P1) such that: enumerate If p> p+(s,λ), the problem has no weak positive supersolutions and a phenomenon of complete and instantaneous blow up happens. If p< p+(s,λ), there exists a positive solution for a suitable class of nonnegative data. enumerate enumerate

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…