Main-Sequence Effective Temperatures from a Revised Mass-Luminosity Relation Based on Accurate Properties

Abstract

The mass-luminosity (M-L), mass-radius (M-R) and mass-effective temperature (M-Teff) diagrams for a subset of galactic nearby main-sequence stars with masses and radii accurate to ≤ 3\% and luminosities accurate to ≤ 30\% (268 stars) has led to a putative discovery. Four distinct mass domains have been identified, which we have tentatively associated with low, intermediate, high, and very high mass main-sequence stars, but which nevertheless are clearly separated by three distinct break points at 1.05, 2.4, and 7M within the mass range studied of 0.38-32M. Further, a revised mass-luminosity relation (MLR) is found based on linear fits for each of the mass domains identified. The revised, mass-domain based MLRs, which are classical (L Mα), are shown to be preferable to a single linear, quadratic or cubic equation representing as an alternative MLR. Stellar radius evolution within the main-sequence for stars with M>1M is clearly evident on the M-R diagram, but it is not the clear on the M-Teff diagram based on published temperatures. Effective temperatures can be calculated directly using the well-known Stephan-Boltzmann law by employing the accurately known values of M and R with the newly defined MLRs. With the calculated temperatures, stellar temperature evolution within the main-sequence for stars with M>1M is clearly visible on the M-Teff diagram. Our study asserts that it is now possible to compute the effective temperature of a main-sequence star with an accuracy of 6\%, as long as its observed radius error is adequately small (<1%) and its observed mass error is reasonably small (<6%).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…