The Joint Embedding Property and Maximal Models
Abstract
We introduce the notion of a `pure` Abstract Elementary Class to block trivial counterexamples. We study classes of models of bipartite graphs and show: Main Theorem (cf. Theorem 3.5.2 and Corollary 3.5.6): If (λi : i α<1) is a strictly increasing sequence of characterizable cardinals (Definition 2.1) whose models satisfy JEP(<λ0), there is an Lω1,ω -sentence whose models form a pure AEC and (1) The models of satisfy JEP(<λ0), while JEP fails for all larger cardinals and AP fails in all infinite cardinals. (2) There exist 2λi+ non-isomorphic maximal models of in λi+, for all i α, but no maximal models in any other cardinality; and (3) has arbitrarily large models. In particular this shows the Hanf number for JEP and the Hanf number for maximality for pure AEC with Lowenheim number 0 are at least ω1. We show that although AP() for each implies the full amalgamation property, JEP() for each does not imply the full joint embedding property. We show the main combinatorial device of this paper cannot be used to extend the main theorem to a complete sentence.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.