Remark on dyadic pointwise domination and median oscillation decomposition
Abstract
In this note, we do the following: a) By using Lacey's recent technique, we give an alternative proof for Conde-Alonso and Rey's domination theorem, which states that each positive dyadic operator of arbitrary complexity is pointwise dominated by a positive dyadic operator of zero complexity: \[ ΣS∈S f μS(k) 1S (k+1) ΣS'∈S' f μS' 1S'. \] b) By following the analogue between median and mean oscillation, we extend Lerner's local median oscillation decomposition to arbitrary (possibly non-doubling) measures: \[ f-m(f,S0) 1S0 ΣS∈S (ωλ(f;S)+ m(f,S)-m(f,S) )1S.\] This can be viewed as a median oscillation decomposition adapted to the dyadic (martingale) BMO. As an application of the decomposition, we give an alternative proof for the dyadic (martingale) John--Nirenberg inequality, and for Lacey's domination theorem, which states that each martingale transform is pointwise dominated by a positive dyadic operator of complexity zero.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.