Harrington's principle over higher order arithmetic

Abstract

Let Z2, Z3, and Z4 denote 2 nd, 3 rd, and 4 th order arithmetic, respectively. We let Harrington's Principle, HP, denote the statement that there is a real x such that every x--admissible ordinal is a cardinal in L. The known proofs of Harrington's theorem "Det(11) implies 0 exists" are done in two steps: first show that Det(11) implies HP, and then show that HP implies 0 exists. The first step is provable in Z2. In this paper we show that Z2 \, + \, HP is equiconsistent with ZFC and that Z3\, + \, HP is equiconsistent with ZFC \, + there exists a remarkable cardinal. As a corollary, Z3\, + \, HP does not imply 0 exists, whereas Z4\, + \, HP does. We also study strengthenings of Harrington's Principle over 2 nd and 3 rd order arithmetic.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…