Reappraisal of the limit on the variation in α implied by Oklo
Abstract
We reconsider the analysis of the sensitivity of neutron resonance energies Ei to changes in α with a view to resolving uncertainties that plague earlier treatments. We point out that, with more appropriate choices of nuclear parameters, the standard estimate (due to Damour and Dyson) of the sensitivity for resonances in 150Sm is increased by a factor of 2.5. We go on to identify and compute excitation, Coulomb and deformation corrections. To this end, we use deformed Fermi density distributions fitted to the output of Hartree-Fock (HF) + BCS calculations (with both the SLy4 and SkM* Skyrme functionals), the energetics of the surface diffuseness of nuclei, and thermal properties of their deformation. We also invoke the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, performing the requisite microcanonical averages with two phenomenological level densities which, via the leptodermous expansion of the level density parameter, include the effect of increased surface diffuseness. Theoretical uncertainties are assessed with the inter-model prescription of Dobaczewski et al. [J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 41, 074001 (2014)]. The corrections diminish the revised 150Sm sensitivity but not by more than 25\%. Subject to a weak and testable restriction on the change in mq/ (relative to the change in α) since the time when the Oklo reactors were active (mq is the average of the u and d current quark masses, and is the mass scale of quantum chromodynamics), we deduce that |αOklo-αnow|<1.1× 10-8αnow (95\% confidence level). The corresponding bound on the present-day time variation of α is tighter than the best limit to date from atomic clock experiments.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.