Gradual Release of Sensitive Data under Differential Privacy

Abstract

We introduce the problem of releasing sensitive data under differential privacy when the privacy level is subject to change over time. Existing work assumes that privacy level is determined by the system designer as a fixed value before sensitive data is released. For certain applications, however, users may wish to relax the privacy level for subsequent releases of the same data after either a re-evaluation of the privacy concerns or the need for better accuracy. Specifically, given a database containing sensitive data, we assume that a response y1 that preserves ε1-differential privacy has already been published. Then, the privacy level is relaxed to ε2, with ε2 > ε1, and we wish to publish a more accurate response y2 while the joint response (y1, y2) preserves ε2-differential privacy. How much accuracy is lost in the scenario of gradually releasing two responses y1 and y2 compared to the scenario of releasing a single response that is ε2-differentially private? Our results show that there exists a composite mechanism that achieves no loss in accuracy. We consider the case in which the private data lies within Rn with an adjacency relation induced by the 1-norm, and we focus on mechanisms that approximate identity queries. We show that the same accuracy can be achieved in the case of gradual release through a mechanism whose outputs can be described by a lazy Markov stochastic process. This stochastic process has a closed form expression and can be efficiently sampled. Our results are applicable beyond identity queries. To this end, we demonstrate that our results can be applied in several cases, including Google's RAPPOR project, trading of sensitive data, and controlled transmission of private data in a social network.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…