Frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: Spin gap and low-energy parameters

Abstract

We use the coupled cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation to investigate the frustrated spin-12 J1--J2--J3 antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice with isotropic Heisenberg interactions of strength J1 > 0 between nearest-neighbor pairs, J2>0 between next-nearest-neighbor pairs, and J3>0 between next-next-neareast-neighbor pairs of spins. In particular, we study both the ground-state (GS) and lowest-lying triplet excited-state properties in the case J3=J2 J1, in the window 0 ≤ ≤ 1 of the frustration parameter, which includes the (tricritical) point of maximum classical frustration at cl = 12. We present GS results for the spin stiffness, s, and the zero-field uniform magnetic susceptibility, , which complement our earlier results for the GS energy per spin, E/N, and staggered magnetization, M, to yield a complete set of accurate low-energy parameters for the model. Our results all point towards a phase diagram containing two quasiclassical antiferromagnetic phases, one with N\'eel order for < c1, and the other with collinear striped order for > c2. The results for both and the spin gap provide compelling evidence for a quantum paramagnetic phase that is gapped over a considerable portion of the intermediate region c1 < < c2, especially close to the two quantum critical points at c1 and c2. Each of our fully independent sets of results for the low-energy parameters is consistent with the values c1 = 0.45 0.02 and c2 = 0.60 0.02, and with the transition at c1 being of continuous (and probably of the deconfined) type and that at c2 being of first-order type.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…