Is q a physical quantity or just a parameter? and other unanswered questions in High-pT Physics
Abstract
The many different theoretical studies of energy loss of a quark or gluon traversing a medium have one thing in common: the transport coefficient of a gluon in the medium, q, which is defined as the mean 4-momentum transfer2, <q2>, by a gluon to the medium per gluon mean free path, λ mfp. In the original BDMPSZ formalism, the energy loss of an outgoing parton, -dE/dx, per unit length (x) of a medium with total length L, due to coherent gluon bremsstrahlung, is proportional to the < q2> and takes the form: -dE/dx αs <q2(L)>=αs\, μ2\, L/λ mfp =αs\, q\, L\ , where μ, is the mean momentum transfer per collision. Thus, the total energy loss in the medium goes like L2. Additionally, the accumulated momentum2, <k2>, transverse to a gluon traversing a length L in the medium is well approximated by <k2>≈<q2(L)>=q\, L. A simple estimate shows that the <k2>≈q\,L should be observable at RHIC at sNN=200 GeV via the broadening of di-hadron azimuthal correlations resulting in an azimuthal width 2 larger in Au+Au than in p+p collisions . Measurements relevant to this issue will be discussed as well as recent STAR jet results presented at QM2014. Other topics to be discussed include the danger of using forward energy to define centrality in p(d)+A collisions for high pT measurements, the danger of not using comparison p+p data at the same s in the same detector for RAA or lately for RpA measurements.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.