Small Width, Low Distortions: Quantized Random Embeddings of Low-complexity Sets

Abstract

Under which conditions and with which distortions can we preserve the pairwise-distances of low-complexity vectors, e.g., for structured sets such as the set of sparse vectors or the one of low-rank matrices, when these are mapped in a finite set of vectors? This work addresses this general question through the specific use of a quantized and dithered random linear mapping which combines, in the following order, a sub-Gaussian random projection in RM of vectors in RN, a random translation, or "dither", of the projected vectors and a uniform scalar quantizer of resolution δ>0 applied componentwise. Thanks to this quantized mapping we are first able to show that, with high probability, an embedding of a bounded set K ⊂ RN in δ ZM can be achieved when distances in the quantized and in the original domains are measured with the 1- and 2-norm, respectively, and provided the number of quantized observations M is large before the square of the "Gaussian mean width" of K. In this case, we show that the embedding is actually "quasi-isometric" and only suffers of both multiplicative and additive distortions whose magnitudes decrease as M-1/5 for general sets, and as M-1/2 for structured set, when M increases. Second, when one is only interested in characterizing the maximal distance separating two elements of K mapped to the same quantized vector, i.e., the "consistency width" of the mapping, we show that for a similar number of measurements and with high probability this width decays as M-1/4 for general sets and as 1/M for structured ones when M increases. Finally, as an important aspect of our work, we also establish how the non-Gaussianity of the mapping impacts the class of vectors that can be embedded or whose consistency width provably decays when M increases.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…