Dual Failure Resilient BFS Structure

Abstract

We study breadth-first search (BFS) spanning trees, and address the problem of designing a sparse fault-tolerant BFS structure, or FT-BFS for short, resilient to the failure of up to two edges in the given undirected unweighted graph G, i.e., a sparse subgraph H of G such that subsequent to the failure of up to two edges, the surviving part H' of H still contains a BFS spanning tree for (the surviving part of) G. FT-BFS structures, as well as the related notion of replacement paths, have been studied so far for the restricted case of a single failure. It has been noted widely that when concerning shortest-paths in a variety of contexts, there is a sharp qualitative difference between a single failure and two or more failures. Our main results are as follows. We present an algorithm that for every n-vertex unweighted undirected graph G and source node s constructs a (two edge failure) FT-BFS structure rooted at s with O(n5/3) edges. To provide a useful theory of shortest paths avoiding 2 edges failures, we take a principled approach to classifying the arrangement these paths. We believe that the structural analysis provided in this paper may decrease the barrier for understanding the general case of f≥ 2 faults and pave the way to the future design of f-fault resilient structures for f ≥ 2. We also provide a matching lower bound, which in fact holds for the general case of f ≥ 1 and multiple sources S ⊂eq V. It shows that for every f≥ 1, and integer 1 ≤ σ ≤ n, there exist n-vertex graphs with a source set S ⊂eq V of cardinality σ for which any FT-BFS structure rooted at each s ∈ S, resilient to up to f-edge faults has (σ1/(f+1) · n2-1/(f+1)) edges.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…