An unexpected encounter with Cauchy and L\'evy

Abstract

The Cauchy distribution is usually presented as a mathematical curiosity, an exception to the Law of Large Numbers, or even as an "Evil" distribution in some introductory courses. It therefore surprised us when Drton and Xiao (2016) proved the following result for m=2 and conjectured it for m 3. Let X= (X1,..., Xm) and Y = (Y1, ...,Ym) be i.i.d N(0,), where =\σij\ 0 is an m× m and arbitrary covariance matrix with σjj>0 for all 1≤ j≤ m. Then Z = Σj=1m wj XjYj \ Cauchy(0,1), as long as w=(w1,..., wm) is independent of (X, Y), wj 0, j=1,..., m, and Σj=1m wj=1. In this note, we present an elementary proof of this conjecture for any m ≥ 2 by linking Z to a geometric characterization of Cauchy(0,1) given in Willams (1969). This general result is essential to the large sample behavior of Wald tests in many applications such as factor models and contingency tables. It also leads to other unexpected results such as Σi=1mΣj=1m wiwjσijXiXj L\'evy(0, 1). This generalizes the "super Cauchy phenomenon" that the average of m i.i.d. standard L\'evy variables (i.e., inverse chi-squared variables with one degree of freedom) has the same distribution as that of a single standard L\'evy variable multiplied by m (which is obtained by taking wj=1/m and to be the identity matrix).

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…