Sharp bounds on the radius of relativistic charged spheres: Guilfoyle's stars saturate the Buchdahl-Andr\'easson bound

Abstract

Buchdahl, by imposing a few physical assumptions on the matter, i.e., its density is a nonincreasing function of the radius and the fluid is a perfect fluid, and on the configuration, such as the exterior is the Schwarzschild solution, found that the radius r0 to mass m ratio of a star would obey the Buchdahl bound r0/m≥9/4. He noted that the bound was saturated by the Schwarzschild interior solution, the solution with m(r)= constant, where m(r) is the energy density of the matter at r, when the central central pressure blows to infinity. Generalizations of this bound have been studied. One generalization was given by Andr\'easson by including electrically charged matter and imposing that p+2pT ≤ m, where p is the radial pressure and pT the tangential pressure. His bound is given by r0/m≥9/(1+1+3\,q2/r02)2, the Buchdahl-Andr\'easson bound, with q being the star's total electric charge. Following Andr\'easson's proof, the configuration that saturates the Buchdahl bound is an uncharged shell, rather than the Schwarzschild interior solution. By extension, the configurations that saturate the Buchdahl-Andr\'easson bound are charged shells. One expects then, in turn, that there should exist an electrically charged equivalent to the interior Schwarzschild limit. We find here that this equivalent is provided by the equation m(r) + Q2(r)/ (8π\,r4)= constant, where Q(r) is the electric charge at r. This equation was put forward by Cooperstock and de la Cruz, and Florides, and realized in Guilfoyle's stars. When the central pressure goes to infinity Guilfoyle's stars are configurations that saturate the Buchdahl-Andr\'easson bound. It remains to find a proof in Buchdahl's manner such that these configurations are the limiting configurations of the bound.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…