Tidal synchronization of close-in satellites and exoplanets. II. Spin dynamics and extension to Mercury and exoplanets host stars

Abstract

This paper deals with the application of the creep tide theory (Ferraz-Mello, CeMDA 116, 109, 2013) to the rotation of close-in satellites, Mercury, close-in exoplanets and their host stars. The solutions show two extreme cases: close-in giant gaseous planets, with fast relaxation (low viscosity) and satellites and Earth-like planets, with slow relaxation (high viscosity). The rotation of close-in gaseous planets follows the classical Darwinian pattern: it is tidally driven towards a stationary solution which is synchronized, but, if the orbit is elliptical, with a frequency larger than the orbital mean-motion. The rotation of rocky bodies, however, may be driven to several attractors whose frequencies are 1/2,1,3/2,2,5/2 ... times the mean-motion. The number of attractors increases with the viscosity of the body and with the orbital eccentricity. The classical example is Mercury, whose rotational period is 2/3 of the orbital period (3/2 attractor). The planet behaves as a molten body with a relaxation that allowed it to cross the 2/1 attractor without being trapped, but not to escape being trapped in the 3/2 one. In that case, the relaxation is estimated to lie in the interval 4.6 -- 27 x 10-9 s-1 (equivalent to a quality factor roughly constrained to the interval 5<Q<50). The stars have relaxation similar to the hot Jupiters and their rotation is also driven to the only stationary solution existing in these cases. However, solar-type stars may lose angular momentum due to stellar wind, braking the rotation and displacing the attractor towards larger periods. Old active host stars with big close-in companions generally have rotational periods larger than the orbital periods of the companions. The paper also includes the study of the energy dissipation and the evolution of the orbital eccentricity.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…